frualeydis: (Default)
[personal profile] frualeydis
I am so going to make this dress. The paint is secondary, so it maybe wasn't a sleeveless layer over a kirtle, but I like it even without that detail. At the neck you can see two layers though, but maybe it was a white shift that later got painted red? Have you seen anything like this from Germany [livejournal.com profile] pinkdiamond or [livejournal.com profile] myralea?
I have ordered up a book from the university library where it is described so I can see if there are any carving lines that suggest the cut that the painting shows, but it doesn't look like it in the photo.
Still, it's a nice swedish dress, the statue was made in Sweden in the first quarter of the 16th century.
I wonder what fabric I should use and for what occasion I shall make it. Probably Visby, but I really should finish Rickard's silk tunicella first. And finish my tudor and make new sleeves for the Anthonis Mor dress. I'm going to make tudor clothes for Rickard too, but that will have to wait until autumn I think.

Date: 2006-03-30 09:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] liadethornegge.livejournal.com
I was just about to say that I can see two layers at the neck, but I see you've edited your post to say that.

Other than that, is she wearing a crown or is that supposed to be a halo? If it is a crown, I kind of like the shape of it.

Date: 2006-03-30 11:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] isiswardrobe.livejournal.com
How lovely! It will be fun to see it evolve!

Date: 2006-03-30 11:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] myralea.livejournal.com
the dress reminds me of details of several types of the southern german types from the 1470-1500s, but i'll have to check up more on that when i get home. this girl is not allowed too much dresshistory research during work hours ;)

the only thing that strikes me somewhat out of place is the contrast coloured sleeves (or is it a sleeveless kirtle?) to that type of dress, but if the paint is secondary that could be one explanation.

pretty dress though! i like those types, and very interesting to see there might be local versions in sweden!
i do wonder what they base their dating on, as i would say it is an earlier dress than the first part of the 16th C. but indeed, we did lag a bit behind fashionwise i guess, especially in the countryside... but that much?

/m

Date: 2006-03-30 12:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chigrima.livejournal.com
Well, my uneducated two cents... :-)

The arms are painted in the same color as the stripe on the bottom of the skirt, and since (at least in my opinion) that stripe is a decoration on the dress and not a kirtle peeking out underneath it, I say the dress is not sleeveless...

Be sure to tell us more about this project!!!

November 2021

S M T W T F S
  123456
7891011 1213
1415 1617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 19th, 2025 06:38 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios