Page Summary
maricelt.livejournal.com - (no subject)
merastra.livejournal.com - (no subject)
snowywolfowl.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sneprinsesse.livejournal.com - (no subject)
therru.livejournal.com - (no subject)
snowywolfowl.livejournal.com - (no subject)
therru.livejournal.com - (no subject)
chigrima.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Pink Panther for Lefty by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2009-08-19 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-20 12:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-20 04:52 am (UTC)Thanks for posting that. Thats an amazing piece of archeology.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-20 07:12 am (UTC)I have eaten one year old butter and a pizza which expired 5 years before (really!), and ca 2000 we found rice which expired in 1979 or something (thus older than a member of our party, who promply came up with the "I won't eat anything older than myself!"-rule) at our mountain farm (but it looked fine, really), but 3000 years old butter beats all that.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-20 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 12:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 12:34 pm (UTC)I'd be interested in knowing if that's a viable method of preserving butter for long periods. Possibly reducing the exposure to oxygen would help with the preservation, since it's mostly the contact with oxygen (and heat) that leads to butter going rancid. Also, removing as much of the not-fat ingredients in butter (milk proteins and so on) as you can helps it keep longer (as when you make ghee from butter). It doesn't say much in the article about the composition of the butter, but perhaps it's not very easy to find that out after 3000 years...
no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 06:42 pm (UTC)Exellent read. Thansk for posting it!