Yet another post this evening:
Mar. 8th, 2007 10:43 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The effigy stays are now finished. I'm considering weaving the lacing ribbon, since I can't make that long fingerloop braids. But that may be taking it too far.
Does anybody have documentation for lucet cords in the 16th century; I know the evidence for it from the middle ages is circumstantial at best, but maybe there is more from the 16th century?
Does anybody have documentation for lucet cords in the 16th century; I know the evidence for it from the middle ages is circumstantial at best, but maybe there is more from the 16th century?
no subject
Date: 2007-03-08 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 05:49 am (UTC)I didn't even think of that. The swedish points that are shown in it are braided, but there may be more.
/Eva
no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 06:11 am (UTC)I'm always in doubt about the stability of lucet cords - I tried the technique once - you just need to have the yarn severely damaged at one point and poof, it's going to get all undone. So I somehow doubt it would really have been used for lacings - but I'd really like to know the facts.
Greetings, Gea
no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 06:16 am (UTC)/Eva
no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 11:02 am (UTC)On the other hand, once it's made, it's very hard to tell lucetted cord from other types of cord just by looking at them, so why not make and use it and just don't say it was lucet?
I happily use lucet cord for pre 17th century costume but won't lucet in fornt of the public due to the encessary explanations about the circumstantial nature of the method in that period.
Teddy