Copulation

Mar. 10th, 2009 11:09 am
frualeydis: (Default)
[personal profile] frualeydis
When studying swedish 17th and early 18th century sumptuary legislation I came across the following, regarding regulation of marriage celebrations: "Since we do not want to change anything in the copulation ceremonies..." in a law from 1644. That's nice to know.

Date: 2009-03-10 11:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] operafantomet.livejournal.com
Ha-ha! I wonder what they would have changed, if they WERE to change anything....

Date: 2009-03-10 03:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fgg-1.livejournal.com
Well, that is good news for the horny Sweds of the 1600's.

Date: 2009-03-10 03:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aeddie.livejournal.com
My mind sees "Copulation Ceremonies" and it goes to really strange places wondering how many priests are required to be in the bedroom and are there formal liturgies for different times of the day.

Add sumptuary laws and I star wondering about other requirements. The lady's nightshift must be made of bleached linen and have a minimum of 2" of embroidery at the hem but no more than 4" unless her husband is of a certain station.

Date: 2009-03-10 04:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frualeydis.livejournal.com
My mind does that too. However, there is very little about clothing in this law, they're more concerned about the amounts of guests at the party, food, musicians and the like.

/Eva

Date: 2009-03-10 04:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aeddie.livejournal.com
That makes it even kinkier.

Date: 2009-03-10 06:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dame-eleanor.livejournal.com
I'm imagining people sending invitations to their "Copulation Ceremony" in lieu of "wedding invitations". Heh... ;>

November 2021

S M T W T F S
  123456
7891011 1213
1415 1617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 26th, 2026 08:10 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios